Ergonomía 4. El trabajo en oficinas. Front Cover. Pedro R. Mondelo, Enrique Gregori Torada, Oscar De Pedro González, Miguel A. Gómez Fernández. Ergonomia 4 by Pedro R. Mondelo at – ISBN – ISBN – Alfaomega Grupo Editor – – Softcover. Results 1 – 30 of 47 ERGONOMÍA 2 by Pedro R. Mondelo and a great selection of related books, art and Ergonomia 4 (Spanish Edition): Mondelo, Pedro R.
|Published (Last):||23 August 2014|
|PDF File Size:||18.14 Mb|
|ePub File Size:||19.60 Mb|
|Price:||Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]|
The study that assesses person versus workplace will be performed with the help of some questions. When we began to define this program and its background theory, our purpose was to make it easy to use, in order to allow anyone in a company to assess their own work place.
At this point you have the option, if you detect any mistake in the data entered or simply if you want to update it, to make some changes. To know in which ergonomiq items the worker has ergonomic problems, you should go further, as if you wanted to assess the workplace, then you would see a screen similar to the one in figure 4.
London and Philadelphia Salud Laboral. Email this article Login required. User Username Password Remember me.
London and Philadelphia Techniques of safety management Petersen, D. The first step is where it requires the name of the working centre and the password; AuditERGO permits to assess different workplaces that pertain to different business. Nondelo example, pedrp you see figure 4, you can see that this worker has some problems that must be corrected urgently in physical workload.
Inside the coloured squares, it also gives you the number of questions that have been answered negatively by the worker, in front of the total each factor has.
Pedro R. Mondelo (Author of Ergonomia 3 – Diseno de Puestos de Trabajo 2b* Ed.)
USERS It is obvious, even when an age, sex or ethnic homogenous group is taken, that human beings are different in shapes and in body measures. The ergonojia will be analysed through the relationship of the worker with the rest of the employees, and the working rhythms, timetable, eating habits, etc.
Finally, it comes to a conclusion that the Didactic TOOL is noteworthy for its purpose, generating interest to the student and the academic community because of its research support in the area.
These circumstances may be presented by taking into account the conditions under which they occur, and by designing workplaces correctly, instead of trying to reduce accident frequency or damage. This problem requires a previous evaluation of the workplace if we want to adapt the workplace to the person or group of persons that are going to spend the working day there.
The way that the program has been made allows to assess each factor independently; it is not necessary to assess all the aspects of the workplace consecutive.
The last part when running the program is to print or view on the screen the final inform. In this section, several psychosocial factors closely related to the way the work is organised are included. AuditERGO structure These four main factors user, organisation, safety and environment represent the first step in the evaluation of a workplace.
As a part of the Industrial Design program at the UDLSB, the subject of Furniture Design attempts to involve students into general problematics concerned to the furniture area, without looking for a strict specialization in each study case. The last factor to take into account in the workplace assessment is the environment.
AuditERGO: a software for the ergonomic assessment of workplaces
Lomas del Campestre, C. The present research contemplated four phases in general. It is obvious, even when an age, sex or pedr homogenous group is taken, that human beings are different in shapes and in body measures.
This program is a good tool to help the worker himself or someone else to assess a workplace. It does not publish reviews, bibliographical revisions, or professional applications.
Then, every time you evaluate certain aspects of a workplace, this screen changes, epdro it becomes a resume of the workplace state. They try to find which are the problems that the worker has in his own workplace.
At this point, we have the main screen of the worker figure 3. Focus on aesthetics and comfort! In this screen there is a question and the possible answers: These four main factors user, organisation, safety and environment represent the first step in the evaluation of a workplace. ISSN – How to cite item. This process was followed by students, who had broadened their knowledge in that matter.
Nevertheless, because of its complexity, is common ergonmia seating furniture it is not ergonomically solved at all.